Maharashtra’s Home Minister Anil Deshmukh has raised some important and fundamental questions on the unbreakable relationship between Corona and Tabligi Jamaat, which has not been able to come up due to unilateral wolf-killing behavior of the media.
Maharashtra Home Minister Anil Deshmukh did not approve the tabligi Jamaat to conduct the meeting. So why did Union Home Minister and BJP’s controversial leader Amit Shah give it?
First of all, the Maharashtra Home Minister has asked the Modi government at the Center to explain why the Union Home Ministry has finally given permission to organize the Ijtema of Tabligi Jamaat in Nizamuddin in Delhi?
It is a very important question that when we know from the beginning that foreign travelers are responsible for the infection of Corona and hundreds of foreign Muslims have to come to this program of Markaz every year, then how the Modi government became careless about this program doing. Deshmukh says that despite the Nizamuddin police station near Markaz, Ijtima was not stopped in view of the Covid-19 threat.
Deshmukh says that on March 15 and 16, 50,000 people from the Tabligi Jamaat were to gather in Mumbai’s suburb of Vasai, but the state government stopped the program.
That is, Deshmukh is asking that when the government of one state was understanding this danger and taking strict steps, why was the Modi government at the center playing with the lives of crores of people? Why did Amit Shah knowingly approve of the assembly tax.
The second question Anil Deshmukh raised was that NSA Ajit Doval had met Jamaat leader Maulana Saad at 2 pm during the event. He questioned the nature of the ‘secret’ conversation that took place between the two. In the same episode, NCP leader Anil Deshmukh also questioned who had sent Ajit Doval to meet Maulana Saad late at night. He asked, “Was it NSA’s job to contact Jamaat members or Delhi Police Commissioner?”
Deshmukh has questioned the government in his letter, ‘Where did Maulana Saad abscond the next day after meeting Ajit Doval? Where is he (Maulana) now? Who is related to them (Jamaat members)?
These questions should be interpreted that the Maharashtra Home Minister is pointing to some difficult treaty that was between the Jamaat and the government? There is also an important fact in this connection that the tabligh episode is going on since March 28, till now its chief Maulana Saad has not even been arrested? But why ? Whenever someone raises this question, he is said to be in self-quarantine, the simple thing is that as long as Maulana Saad is out, the media will be able to debate the issue, this is too big to prolong his arrest. Advantage!
The Maharashtra Home Minister also asked why Ajit Doval and Delhi Police Commissioner SN Srivastava have not spoken on the issue.
BJP’s oldest ally Shiv Sena is NCP coalition government in Maharashtra, Uddhav Thackeray, son of Balasaheb Thackeray, is the Chief Minister, ie the question raised by his trusted aide party is why the Union Home Ministry is not responsible for spreading corona virus infection across the country Should be held? So is this question important or not?