ગુજરાતી
English
From Phone Surveillance to AI Intelligence: The Expanding Scope of Gujarat’s Monitoring System over 25 Years
Dilip Patel
June 11, 2026, Ahmedabad
Amid the growing mechanisms for action against cybercrimes, digital intelligence, and AI-driven policing in Gujarat, old debates regarding phone surveillance and government monitoring have once again been revived. Over the last 25 years, Gujarat has traversed a long journey from mobile surveillance, Call Detail Record (CDR) analysis, and digital forensics to now Artificial Intelligence-based monitoring.
At various times in the state, allegations of phone tapping and surveillance were made by the Congress, rebel BJP leaders, and social activists. Although many such allegations were never officially confirmed, the discussions around surveillance have remained a constant political issue.
The Debate Triggered by Gordhan Zadafia
In the year 2004, the then Minister of State for Home, Gordhan Zadafia, alleged during his speech in the Legislative Assembly that his phone was kept under police surveillance. Former Minister Haren Pandya had also complained about being monitored. Subsequently, leaders of various political parties made periodic allegations of phone tapping and phone surveillance.
In later years, opposition leaders, including Congress leaders Arjun Modhwadia and Paresh Dhanani, also accused the government of creating political pressure through phone surveillance.
The Controversy Over 93,000 Phone Numbers
In 2013, the then chief of Gujarat Police, Amitabh Pathak, issued an order stating that any officer applying to a telecom company to put a phone number under surveillance must hold at least the rank of SP (Superintendent of Police).
During the same period, information surfaced that CDRs (Call Detail Records) of approximately 93,000 phone numbers had been obtained within a span of 90 days in the state. Importantly, this figure of 93,000 was not related to phone tapping, but rather to cases of retrieving Call Detail Records. CDRs provide information on who was called, when the call was made, and from which mobile tower, but they do not contain the audio recording of the conversation.
The Snooping Case and Political Dispute
Gujarat’s controversial “Snooping Case” also sparked a nationwide debate. In this case, allegations emerged regarding the surveillance of a young woman. The names of the then Minister of State for Home, Amit Shah, and several police officers came into the spotlight.
Although multiple investigations and political controversies followed, no final judicial conclusion was reached. On June 9, 2013, former IPS officer G.L. Singhal handed over certain recordings and documents to investigative agencies. Following this, the entire issue became a major talking point in national politics.
Evolution of Surveillance Technology
The electronic surveillance architecture in Gujarat has undergone continuous transformation:
-
2001: The police primarily relied on basic CDRs.
-
2005: The use of IMEI tracking commenced.
-
2008: Following the Ahmedabad serial bomb blasts, extensive analysis of CDRs and IMEIs of thousands of mobile connections was utilized.
-
Post-2010: The era of the Central Monitoring System (CMS) began.
-
2015: Social Media Intelligence was integrated.
-
2018: The capacities of digital forensic labs and cybercrime police stations were enhanced.
-
Post-2020: Emphasis shifted toward UPI and online fraud tracking.
-
From 2023: AI-based cyber analysis was introduced.
-
2025-26: Focus was directed toward new frontiers like crypto transactions and Dark Web intelligence.
The New Architecture of the Cyber Era
A 24×7 Cyber Cell is operational within the State Crime Branch, along with cyber cells across various ranges in the state. Hundreds of officers and personnel have been deployed to combat cybercrimes.
In 2018, specialized cyber infrastructure was developed in Ahmedabad, Vadodara, Rajkot, and Surat. Since then, cyber investigation capabilities have been upgraded annually. Recently, the Cyber Centre of Excellence exposed scams worth crores of rupees by cracking down on nationwide cyber fraud networks.
Smartphones and Digital Information
The Central Government has clarified that investigative agencies can intercept digital communication and obtain computer-based data under due legal process and prescribed permissions.
Union Minister of State for Home Affairs, G. Kishan Reddy, stated in Parliament that according to the law, both the Central and State governments possess the authority to intercept digital communications and data under a specified framework. However, the government also clarified that no agency has been permitted unchecked or sweeping mass surveillance, and strict review procedures are in place for every individual case.
From Pegasus to AI
International controversies surrounding the Pegasus spyware also fueled the debate over digital privacy. According to cybersecurity experts, such sophisticated software can infiltrate mobile devices to access calls, messages, emails, location, and other digital data. In India, too, political and legal debates occurred regarding Pegasus, though differences of opinion remain unresolved on several aspects.
Balancing Security and Privacy
On one hand, modern digital intelligence has become essential to combat terrorism, drug trafficking, cyber fraud, and organized crime. On the other hand, questions of citizen privacy, transparency, and accountability have gained significant importance.
The journey that began with basic CDRs in 2001 in Gujarat has now advanced to AI-based intelligence, data fusion, and Dark Web monitoring. How a balance is struck between security and civil liberties in the coming years will be the biggest challenge for the state’s digital governance.
